Healthcare Technology Integration

Healthcare Technology Integration

Topic: holistic integration of a Real-Time Locating System (RTLS) through a dedicated department

Setting: doctoral comprehensive examination for organizational leadership

Opportunity

Stevens Medicine has a problem: the hospital adopted an institution-wide technological solution without a strategy to account for the necessary organizational change behind its realization. When fully implemented, the technology generates data on the movement and location of patients, providers, and equipment (Sooyoung Yoo et al., 2018). Comparable institutions have utilized the data to drive improvements in equipment management, employee workflow, and patient experience. While the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) expects to create a new department to facilitate these institution-wide initiatives, the endeavor must account for a historically Divisional structure and culture (Robbins & Judge, 2019). 

While individual departments could apply the technology within their units and context, the main benefits come from a holistic organizational view. As defined by the CEO, the purpose of an RTLS department would be to gather the organization-wide patterns, assess their implications, and make strategic decisions that impact all departments. Within the context of one of the staff feedback items, the department could use data infusion pump movement across the hospital to develop insights about which departments are falling below their minimum number of required pumps (Martinez et al., 2020). Where to source those additional pumps could then be informed by which departments are above their maximum number of required pumps. From these foundations, an infusion pump management system could be established with automated processes to ensure that all departments are adequately supplied.

At this intersection of intention and capability is where the problem begins. While departments across Stevens Medicine supported the decision to install the RTLS technology for the purported equipment-locating benefits, the concept of a new cross-cutting department was not agreed upon or considered. The CEO of Stevens Medicine stands behind the vendor’s recommendation and wants the RTLS department to come to fruition. While considerations of departmental logistics and technical training will be touched on, the primary purpose of this paper is to use relevant frameworks to understand what such a change is asking of the institution and outline how the change will be effectively implemented within that context.

Strategy Overview

Final Strategy

The change initiative of incorporating the RTLS department into Stevens Medicine sees the Structural, Human Resource, Political, and Symbolic environments leveraged in a Democratic leadership manner (Bolman & Deal, 2021; Goleman, 2000). With Lewin’s Change Approach being inherently democratic, the model’s stages guide the big picture of the change strategy. At the same time, Kotter’s (1995) Eight Steps provide prescriptive actions at certain moments of those stages (Lewin, 1945). The change strategy’s participative and engaging nature helps to set the stage for a Community of Practice to organically form and augment the work of the new department (Wenger, 1998). Benchmarks for success will be initially documented with employee surveys, user adoption, reduced wait times, and departmental equipment levels (Kraft, 1997). However, the robust amount of data capture and future projects provide opportunities for metrics-driven organizational wins that continually demonstrate the success of the department and the RTLS technology. Overall, this change strategy allows for an intentional, comprehensive redefinition of how Stevens Medicine delivers excellent healthcare through the utilization of robust data and facilitated coordination between departments.

For a deep dive into the holistic organizational strategy and utilized theoretical frameworks, the full comprehensive report is provided for download below.

References

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2021). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership (7th ed.). Jossey-Bass, a John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Imprint.

Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78, 78–93.

Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 121.

Kraft, J. (1997). The department of the Navy benchmarking handbook: A systems view. Total Quality Leadership Office. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA332022.pdf

Lewin, K. (1945). Conduct, knowledge, and acceptance of new values. In Resolving Social Conflicts. Souvenir Press.

Martinez, D. A., Cai, J., Oke, J. B., Jarrell, A. S., Feijoo, F., Appelbaum, J., Klein, E., Barnes, S., & Levin, S. R. (2020). Where is my infusion pump? Harnessing network dynamics for improved hospital equipment fleet management. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(6), 884–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa033

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.

Sooyoung Yoo, Kim, S., Kim, E., Jung, E., Lee, K.-H., & Hwang, H. (2018). Real-time location system-based asset tracking in the healthcare field: lessons learned from a feasibility study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0656-0

Wenger, E., Mcdermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.